Restricted content is only restricted if the platform holds.
Pharmaceutical website security for platforms carrying professional areas, personal data and restricted documentation: hardening, controlled updates, access review and the monitoring that makes a breach visible early.
The exposure on a pharma site is rarely the public content. It is the professional area holding prescriber data, the document library serving restricted material, and the twelve administrator accounts belonging to people who left the agency three years ago.
Platform hardening, access and account review, controlled update policy, monitoring and alerting, backup verification, and documentation of the configuration for your IT function.
We harden and maintain the platforms we build and run, and set them up so whoever performs your penetration testing or certification audit has a clean, well-documented platform to assess.
The surface behind our pharmaceutical website security work.
The asset worth protecting differs. Pharmaceutical website security starts from what the platform holds.
What IT and compliance teams ask about platform security.
No. Penetration testing is specialist work, and it should be carried out independently from whoever built the platform, which is the whole point of running one. We harden and maintain the site, support the independent audit process, and remediate whatever findings the audit report identifies afterward.
The platform choice is rarely the deciding factor in a breach. What compromises sites is unmaintained dependencies, plugins abandoned by their upstream developer and stale administrator accounts, and those risks exist on every platform equally. A properly maintained WordPress install is considerably safer than an unmaintained enterprise CMS.
You remain the data controller throughout. We build and operate the portal to the requirements your data protection officer sets, implement retention and deletion schedules exactly as specified, and act only as a processor within that arrangement. We do not take on controller responsibilities for the data at any point.
Yes, and it is a common starting point. Sometimes the honest conclusion is that hardening the existing build costs more than replacing it, particularly where the platform is several major versions behind. We say that when it is the case.
Security work usually sits inside a maintenance agreement rather than as a one-off. These are the services it connects to.
A platform nobody has updated, a portal holding personal data, or an audit that flagged something. Tell us what you have and we will tell you how we would approach the pharmaceutical website security work.